Trev, Kevin, whomever ... has anyone changed anything recently
regarding filtering in-line URLs posted to the xfs@oss list?
Thanks
-- Mark
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [nfsv4] AD review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gss-v2-03
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:05:34 +0300
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxx>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@xxxxxxxx>
Section 1, paragraph 0:
RPCSEC_GSS version 2 (RPCSEC_GSSv2) is the same as RPCSEC_GSS
version
1 (RPCSEC_GSSv1) except that support for channel bindings has been
added.
I'd be good to add a citation to [2] for RPCSEC_GSSv1 and RFC5056 for
"channel bindings." We can do that with an RFC Editor Note - send me
one.
Section 7., paragraph 1:
The security considerations are the same as [2].
This document is all about applying a security mechanism (channel
bindings) to [2]. Surely this raises new security considerations?
If not, please explain why not - this is surely something the
security
directorate will want to know.
_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
--
Mark Goodwin markgw@xxxxxxx
Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP Phone: +61-3-99631937
SGI Australian Software Group Cell: +61-4-18969583
-------------------------------------------------------------
|