| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 10/21] implement generic xfs_btree_decrement |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:40:19 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20080730020919.GK13395@disturbed> |
| References: | <20080729193058.GK19104@lst.de> <20080730020919.GK13395@disturbed> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:09:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:30:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > [hch: split out from bigger patch and minor adaptions]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ....
> > + /*
> > + * If we went off the root then we are seriously confused.
> > + * or the root of the tree is in an inode.
> > + */
> > + if (lev == cur->bc_nlevels) {
> > + ASSERT(cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE);
> > + goto out0;
> > + }
>
> Same question as for the increment case.
Ok, changed.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 09/21] implement generic xfs_btree_increment, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/21] implement generic xfs_btree_lookup, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 09/21] implement generic xfs_btree_increment, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/21] implement generic xfs_btree_lookup, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |