[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:32:36 +1000
Cc: sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080728121534.GA12715@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080728062625.BB57158C4C3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080728121534.GA12715@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: lachlan@xxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20080707)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:26:25PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
kill bhv_vnode_t

All remaining bhv_vnode_t instance are in code that's more or less Linux
specific.  (Well, for xfs_acl.c that could be argued, but that code is
on the removal list, too).  So just do an s/bhv_vnode_t/struct inode/
over the whole tree.  We can clean up variable naming and some useless
helpers later.

Thanks,  but I wonder how this could even apply without the
intialize_vnode cleanup..

It applied fine.  Didn't build though - I had to change a couple more

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>