|To:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t|
|From:||Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:32:36 +1000|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 188.8.131.52 (X11/20080707)|
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:26:25PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:kill bhv_vnode_t All remaining bhv_vnode_t instance are in code that's more or less Linux specific. (Well, for xfs_acl.c that could be argued, but that code is on the removal list, too). So just do an s/bhv_vnode_t/struct inode/ over the whole tree. We can clean up variable naming and some useless helpers later.Thanks, but I wonder how this could even apply without the intialize_vnode cleanup..
It applied fine. Didn't build though - I had to change a couple more bhv_vnode_t's.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||TAKE 981498 - sanitize xfs_initialize_vnode, Niv Sardi-Altivanik|
|Next by Date:||[REVIEW] Cleanup more dir v1 macros and stuff, Barry Naujok|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t, Christoph Hellwig|
|Next by Thread:||xfs_lowbit32 implementation, Barry Naujok|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|