[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t

To: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:15:34 -0400
Cc: sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080728062625.BB57158C4C3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080728062625.BB57158C4C3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:26:25PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> kill bhv_vnode_t
> All remaining bhv_vnode_t instance are in code that's more or less Linux
> specific.  (Well, for xfs_acl.c that could be argued, but that code is
> on the removal list, too).  So just do an s/bhv_vnode_t/struct inode/
> over the whole tree.  We can clean up variable naming and some useless
> helpers later.

Thanks,  but I wonder how this could even apply without the
intialize_vnode cleanup..

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>