Re: [PATCH 0/4] XFS: replace the mount inode list with radix tree traversals V2

[Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>]

Dave Chinner wrote:
> The list of all inodes on a mount is superfluous. We can traverse
> all inodes now by walking the per-AG inode radix trees without
> needing a separate list. This enables us to remove a bunch of
> complex list traversal code and remove another two pointers from
> the xfs_inode.
sounds like a good move.

> Also, by replacing the sync traversal with an ascending inode
> number traversal, we will issue better inode I/O patterns for
> writeback triggered by xfssyncd or unmount.
Dave, have you made any performance measurements showing this to
be the case? If so, what is the improvement? Or should we just assume
such traversals will be more naturally sequential and therefore more
efficient?

Cheers
-- Mark