[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsrestore over ssh?

To: "Nathan Scott" <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsrestore over ssh?
From: "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:45:00 +0200
Cc: "Timothy Shimmin" <tes@xxxxxxx>, "Bill Kendall" <wkendall@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=aZFFaZux+whxeOlnGUf9WZV3O2S2CAFuM9PIC+VoDvY=; b=x1Hi5CquScJ3MKCOwQRz9Jae70cO5ef0KAFS2P8ntAqjv7kQNkizbRH5nWLGoCiZX8 bvSniTFTYUEW3KMj5nR855/bAFZL1NWkViK/c/UgMwVLw7BkIdeRwsV2Oo47j0kOC9ny B4EbzAHv5PELEndqDwiQ4162JUZveRvr/PlD0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ntQOLtDJQEjTXs+RKrhsOa+N6oCDePsyee7FhjbGC0DoC6Z4OvbYRpqCcSmXkm7j0N oXjGlIaMRT7HmWRpLBVPd98z4lJAMWBSY36xOY/fwYTXFB8317gSKxLnU3pZedanWRLu pkxfAHbU4AAJjODy+q29MJSe5X+X8FQxS6FH0=
In-reply-to: <1216708397.4499.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2d460de70807211317m75bc236y403d8fa57514262e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4884F2A5.5050507@xxxxxxx> <2d460de70807212002k1a95706ic8291e2abd8796b8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48855B16.4050208@xxxxxxx> <1216708397.4499.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:33, Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "unable to construct a file system handle" - theres only one place
> in the restore code that can come from - the path_to_fshandle call.
> Is there a 32 bit userspace and 64 bit kernel on the machine where
> xfsrestore is running?

The dump was created on a 32 bit system, is stored on a 32 bit
system and I am trying to restore on (the first) 32 bit system, again.

Both the backed-up & the storage system have Debian's 2.2.48-1
version of xfsdump.

> Its not clear to me what that code in xfsrestore is trying to do,
> you may be able to just comment it out...?!?

I would like to avoid hacks like this if possible at all. That is asking
for trouble, especially when the root file system is concerned :/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>