xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Power loss causes bad magic number??

To: "Stephen Porter" <stephenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Power loss causes bad magic number??
From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:17:21 +0200
Cc: "Russell Cattelan" <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <F46A887185FC6044A7FAC577E31118AE02231846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Stephen Porter's message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:52:43 +1000")
References: <F46A887185FC6044A7FAC577E31118AE022316C0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <487D5F80.1050909@xxxxxxxxxxx> <F46A887185FC6044A7FAC577E31118AE021E0623@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080716073503.GE29319@disturbed> <F46A887185FC6044A7FAC577E31118AE021E0625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <487F4AC5.3000806@xxxxxxxxxxx> <F46A887185FC6044A7FAC577E31118AE02231846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
"Stephen Porter" <stephenp@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>   
> I think this is going to be my only option (unless I want to keep
> updating fstab entries each time _something_ updates on the box).  Time
> to visit google again.  I realise this is now way off topic, but is
> there a "preferred method" with regards to mounting by labels or uuid?

Modern distributions generall give you several other options using udev.
e.g. common is using /dev/disk/by-path/ (which should be stable)
Drawback is that this always requires a initrd for mounting /

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>