| To: | Martin Steigerwald <ms@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is it possible the check an frozen XFS filesytem to avoid downtime |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:27:39 -0500 |
| Cc: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200807150944.13277.ms@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200807141542.51613.ms@xxxxxxxxx> <487C1BAF.2030404@xxxxxxx> <200807150944.13277.ms@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Okay... we recommended the customer to do it the safe way unmounting the > filesystem completely. He did and the filesystem appear to be intact *phew*. > XFS appeared to detect the in memory corruption early enough. > > Its a bit strange however, cause we now know that the server sports ECC RAM. > Well we will see what memtest86+ has to say about it. in-memory corruption could mean, but certainly does not absolutely mean, problematic memory. It could be, and usually is, a plain ol' bug (in xfs or elsewhere). -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Benchmarks: Linux Kernel RAID vs a Hardware RAID setup, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Power loss causes bad magic number??, Stephen Porter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is it possible the check an frozen XFS filesytem to avoid downtime, Martin Steigerwald |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is it possible the check an frozen XFS filesytem to avoid downtime, Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |