| To: | Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs bug in 2.6.26-rc9 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:22:50 -0400 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200807151617.58329.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807110939520.30192@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <487B019B.9090401@xxxxxxx> <20080714121332.GX29319@disturbed> <200807151617.58329.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
> It would be easily possible to do, yes. What happened to your plans to merge ->nopfn into ->fault? Beeing able to restart page based faults would be a logical fallout from that. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] kill vn_revalidate, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Benchmarks: Linux Kernel RAID vs a Hardware RAID setup, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs bug in 2.6.26-rc9, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs bug in 2.6.26-rc9, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |