| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs leaking? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:31:39 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20080711233832.GH11558@disturbed> |
| References: | <4877928A.1020008@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080711233832.GH11558@disturbed> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:04:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> after my fill-the-1T-fs-with-20k-files test I tried an xfs_repair, and >> it was sorrowfully slow compared to e2fsck of ext4 - I stopped it after >> almost 2 hours, and only half complete. >> >> I noticed that during the run, I was about out of memory (8G) and >> swapping badly. >> >> So I unmounted the fs, dropped caches, and was astounded to find >> 10492540 buffer heads still in the slab caches. Hm that sounds like I unmounted after xfs_repair. That didn't come out right - no, I did not repair a mounted filesystem ;) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs leaking?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs leaking?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs leaking?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Update Your E-mail now., Email Update Center. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |