| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] re-remove xfs custom bitops |
| From: | Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:03:15 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <486C75DD.2040109@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <480EB397.1040304@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4829C360.5060500@xxxxxxxxxxx> <482BF841.8050704@xxxxxxx> <48669A45.1050104@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4868A114.9080106@xxxxxxx> <486C322D.7080203@xxxxxxxxxxx> <486C75DD.2040109@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Donald Douwsma wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote:Donald Douwsma wrote:First time round I hit an Oops on xfstests/177 while running the auto group on ppc32. I dont seem to hit it running the single test, its intermittent.Funky. Do you ever hit it w/ the patch reverted?That's the question. So far no, the QA guys said they hit it a while ago, but the time frame still matches last time. I dont think this is related but I need to get some more ppc32 runs without. I'm probably being over cautious but I'd like to avoid the inagain/outagain/inagain/outagain approach we keep using with some of these cleanups. Don Ok I hit the Oops again last weekend without the patch. Which means I have a patch to checkin and another bug to fix Yea! Dave, Eric said this should still be considered signed-off-by you, You ok with that? Eric, am I ok to add yours too since you kept this on the radar? Don |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** failure notice, MAILER-DAEMON |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] re-remove xfs custom bitops, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] re-remove xfs custom bitops, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] re-remove xfs custom bitops, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |