[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature

To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:48:30 +0200
Cc: arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1KGTmZ-0006oz-Qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080708232031.GE18195@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080709005254.GQ11558@disturbed> <20080709010922.GE9957@xxxxxxx> <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080709061621.GA5260@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1KGT4q-0006fD-Jb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080708234120.5072111f@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1KGTTm-0006ke-Jh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080708235502.1c52a586@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1KGTmZ-0006oz-Qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Wed 2008-07-09 09:08:07, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > I tihnk the idea there is
> > 
> > freeze . do the snapshot op . unfreeze . make backup of snapshot
> Ah, so then my proposal would become
>   run_frozen mountpoint do-snapshot
>   do-backup
>   release-snapshot
> and if they are afraid of deadlocks they can just implement the
> timeout in userspace:
>   run_frozen -t timeout mountpoint do-snapshot
> 'run_frozen' can be a trivial 30 line app, that can be guaranteed not
> to deadlock.

Userland apps can be swapped out and need kernel memory allocations
during syscalls.

I bet even sleep(30) uses kmalloc internally.

So yes, even trivial applications can deadlock.

(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>