| To: | hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature |
| From: | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:22:56 +0200 |
| Cc: | miklos@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080709061621.GA5260@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Christoph Hellwig on Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:16:21 -0400) |
| References: | <20080630212450t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080701081026.GB16691@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080707110730.GG5643@xxxxxx> <20080708231026.GP11558@disturbed> <20080708232031.GE18195@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080709005254.GQ11558@disturbed> <20080709010922.GE9957@xxxxxxx> <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080709061621.GA5260@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > This would mean that freeze and thaw will have to be done on the same > > file descriptor, but this isn't unreasonable to expect, is it? > > It is certainly not the current use case, where you run one command > to freeze the filesystem and another one to unfreeze it. So instead of freeze_fs mountpoint backup-command unfreeze_fs mountpoint the user would have do to run_freezed mountpoint backup-command I find the second one nicer, regardless of any reliability issues. Miklos |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Arjan van de Ven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Arjan van de Ven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |