| To: | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:16:21 -0400 |
| Cc: | tytso@xxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080630212450t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080701081026.GB16691@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080707110730.GG5643@xxxxxx> <20080708231026.GP11558@disturbed> <20080708232031.GE18195@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080709005254.GQ11558@disturbed> <20080709010922.GE9957@xxxxxxx> <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This would mean that freeze and thaw will have to be done on the same > file descriptor, but this isn't unreasonable to expect, is it? It is certainly not the current use case, where you run one command to freeze the filesystem and another one to unfreeze it. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Miklos Szeredi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Miklos Szeredi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Miklos Szeredi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature, Miklos Szeredi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |