[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature

To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:16:21 -0400
Cc: tytso@xxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080630212450t-sato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080701081026.GB16691@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080707110730.GG5643@xxxxxx> <20080708231026.GP11558@disturbed> <20080708232031.GE18195@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080709005254.GQ11558@disturbed> <20080709010922.GE9957@xxxxxxx> <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This would mean that freeze and thaw will have to be done on the same
> file descriptor, but this isn't unreasonable to expect, is it?

It is certainly not the current use case, where you run one command
to freeze the filesystem and another one to unfreeze it.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>