xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, RFC] - remove mountpoint UUID code

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] - remove mountpoint UUID code
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:09:02 -0500
Cc: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080312072259.GA26148@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <47D20F78.7000103@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1205196252.15982.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47D5DE13.8030902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <34665.192.168.3.1.1205266196.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080312072259.GA26148@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 07:09:56AM +1100, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I don't have any immediate plans.  I can imagine it could be used to
>> stitch parts of the namespace together in a filesystem that supports
>> multiple devices (in a chunkfs kinda way) ... or maybe more simply
>> just an in-filesystem auto-mounter.  *shrug*.  But its there, the tools
>> support it (once again, I didn't see a userspace patch - hohum), so I
>> would vote for leaving it in its current form so some enterprising,
>> constructive young coder can try to make something useful from it
>> at some point.  :)
> 
> That kind of automounter really doesn't belong into the low-level
> filesystem.  If we really wanted it it would go into the VFS, storing
> the uuid or other identifier for the mountpoint in an xattr.  This is
> really just dead junk that should go away.

Can I get a yea or nay on this from sgi, then?

Thanks,
-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH, RFC] - remove mountpoint UUID code, Eric Sandeen <=