Jason White wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:54:38PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> This really is grub that is busted, but I'd still just suggest using
>> ext3 to (mostly) work around the breakage for the foreseeable future.
>> The other option is to teach grub to always do its io via the filesystem
>> not the block device while the fs is mounted (IIRC there are various &
>> sundry non-intuitive commands which actually nudge grub towards or away
>> from this desired behavior... --with-stage2=/path is one I think,
>> skipping the "verification" phase (i.e. trying to read the block dev
>> while mounted) is another)
> Does grub 2 (still in development when last I checked) improve on this
No idea. Does anyone use grub2? My impression is that each distro is
currently just maintaining a fork of grub(1). If grub2 is using more
than "sync and hope" I'd be pleasantly surprised. :)
> I managed to get Grub 1 installed on machines with XFS root file systems by
> running the install from within the grub "shell" environment rather than using
> grub-install. Maybe this skips the checks that attempt to read the block
> device directly. I also recall that grub-install failed.
Yep, this might be some of the "magic" I talked about w.r.t. behavior of
different grub incantations.