| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 10/21] implement generic xfs_btree_decrement |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:09:19 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080729193058.GK19104@lst.de> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20080729193058.GK19104@lst.de> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:30:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
>
> [hch: split out from bigger patch and minor adaptions]
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
....
> + /*
> + * If we went off the root then we are seriously confused.
> + * or the root of the tree is in an inode.
> + */
> + if (lev == cur->bc_nlevels) {
> + ASSERT(cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE);
> + goto out0;
> + }
Same question as for the increment case.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 09/21] implement generic xfs_btree_increment, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/21] implement generic xfs_btree_lookup, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 10/21] implement generic xfs_btree_decrement, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 09/21] implement generic xfs_btree_increment, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |