| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:15:34 -0400 |
| Cc: | sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080728062625.BB57158C4C3F@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20080728062625.BB57158C4C3F@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:26:25PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > kill bhv_vnode_t > > All remaining bhv_vnode_t instance are in code that's more or less Linux > specific. (Well, for xfs_acl.c that could be argued, but that code is > on the removal list, too). So just do an s/bhv_vnode_t/struct inode/ > over the whole tree. We can clean up variable naming and some useless > helpers later. Thanks, but I wonder how this could even apply without the intialize_vnode cleanup.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dropped Patches PING [ XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock], Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [rfc][patch 1/3] mm: vmap rewrite, Nick Piggin |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 981498 - kill bhv_vnode_t, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |