| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] XFS: Use the inode tree for finding dirty inodes |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:46:10 +1000 |
| Cc: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080723204927.GB8421@infradead.org> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <1216556394-17529-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1216556394-17529-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20080722042829.GB27123@infradead.org> <20080722053019.GI6761@disturbed> <20080722072733.GA15376@infradead.org> <20080723000548.GG5947@disturbed> <488692FB.1010101@sgi.com> <20080723204927.GB8421@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:49:27PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Btw, does anyone have recent gcov data for XFS? Last time I checked (not recent) xfsqa covered about 70% of XFS with default mkfs and mount options. The code has changed a lot since then and there's been quite a few additional tests added, so I've got no idea right now... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent log tail pushing from blocking on buffer locks, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: partially uptodate page reads, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] XFS: Use the inode tree for finding dirty inodes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 3/4] XFS: Traverse inode trees when releasing dquots, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |