xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly

from [Christoph Hellwig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:07:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <20080724062220.GB26938@lst.de>
References: <20080723194950.GF6188@lst.de> <20080723225548.GO6761@disturbed> <20080724062220.GB26938@lst.de>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i 
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:22:20AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Makes sense, updated patch below.  (Half-way through xfsqa with a debug
> kernel so far)

xfsqa passed fine with this patch applied.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH 1/5] kill vn_from_inode, Lachlan McIlroy
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly, Lachlan McIlroy
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH 5/5] implement IHOLD/IRELE directly, Lachlan McIlroy
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]