Re: [PATCH 0/2] kill bhv_vnode_t

[Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Dave complained today that the fate of bhv_vnode_t isn't entirely clear
> yet, so I've prepared these two patches to kill it in a minimally
> invasive way.  While it causes churn in a lot of areas it does not
> affect the generated code at all.
>
>   
I know a bunch of stuff has gone in that is not very portable, which is 
fine since
they can be dealt with individually since they are not that intrusive.

Changing bhv_vnode_t to struct inode throughout the code is a pretty big
change and would be a major pain to work around.


-Russell