| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] XFS: sanitise VFS inode extraction V2 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:55:04 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1216640819-19924-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> |
| References: | <1216640819-19924-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:46:56PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Getting the VFS inode from the XFS inode is done in a variety of > ways right now - direct deference or one of two XFS_ITOV macros. > This should be consistent throughout the code - this patch > series does that in a way that is consistent with the opposite > XFS_I() conversion. We now use VFS_I() to extract the VFS inode > from the XFS inode. > > Version 2: > o don't use vn_to_inode() and inode_to_vn() functions as they > are not needed > o rediff patches 2 and 3 against the change patch. ACK for all three patches. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] XFS: Use KM_NOFS for incore inode extent tree allocation V2, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] XFS: Kill xfs_vtoi(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] XFS: Avoid directly referencing the VFS inode V2, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] XFS: sanitise VFS inode extraction V2, Niv Sardi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |