| To: | Chris Torek <chris.torek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: question about xfs_fsync on linux |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:48:30 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200807150129.m6F1THE23901@elf.torek.net> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Chris Torek <chris.torek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20080714230300.GY29319@disturbed> <200807150129.m6F1THE23901@elf.torek.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:29:16PM -0600, Chris Torek wrote: > >What kernel(s), exactly, is/are showing this problem? > > Well, that part is a bit tricky. The base kernel is 2.6.21 > but it has a lot of patches, including the one you mentioned. > (The customer is double checking to make sure they actually have > that patch in.) Well, you are pretty much on your own, then. Really, we cannot help diagnose problems on old kernels with a random set of backported patches in them. If you can provide a reproducable test case that triggers the problem on a recent, pristine tree then we can find the problem and fix it. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fix up delta calculation for xfs_bmap_add_extent_unwritten_real, Lachlan McIlroy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs bug in 2.6.26-rc9, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: question about xfs_fsync on linux, Chris Torek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: question about xfs_fsync on linux, Chris Torek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |