| To: | Alan Piszcz <ap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10) |
| From: | Hannes Dorbath <light@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:44:28 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807060447180.5005@p34.internal.lan> |
| References: | <fa.u8J+BqAcxU1mg8ob9pMBJaAHBPo@ifi.uio.no> <486FBFAB.5050303@shaw.ca> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807051527210.8002@p34.internal.lan> <48700228.7060904@shaw.ca> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807051923380.23222@p34.internal.lan> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807060447180.5005@p34.internal.lan> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Justin Piszcz wrote:
In short, utilizing Raptors (especially veliciraptors)+NCQ on the ICH8 w/AHCI & other cards in a RAID 5 configuration is a death trap (a good way to lose your data), it appears unsafe to use NCQ w/raptors in a RAID 5 To my knowledge NCQ and Raptors is completely broken. Besides that, I have really bad experiences with the reliability of those drives.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |