Mark Goodwin schrieb:
Christoph Litauer wrote:
Mark Goodwin schrieb:
..
We have a design proposal known as "inode32+" that essentially removes
the direct mapping between inode number and disk offset. This will
provide all the layout and performance benefits of ino64 without the
interop issues. Until inode32+ is available, we need to keep ino64.
Hi,
as I have massive performance problems using xfs with millions of
inodes, I am very interested in this "incode32+".
can you please post some details of the problems you're seeing?
Please see thread "Performance problems with millions of inodes". If you
don't have it anymore, I can send it to you.
My server is a 32 bit machine, so I am not able to use inode64.
Is it available?
inode32+ is only a design at the moment. An implementation is several
months away. Until then, you'll have to update your server to 64bit.
This is, sadly, not an option at the moment ...
--
Regards
Christoph
________________________________________________________________________
Christoph Litauer litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Uni Koblenz, Computing Center, http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~litauer
Postfach 201602, 56016 Koblenz Fon: +49 261 287-1311, Fax: -100 1311
PGP-Fingerprint: F39C E314 2650 650D 8092 9514 3A56 FBD8 79E3 27B2
|