[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rfc: kill ino64 mount option

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: rfc: kill ino64 mount option
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:52:08 -0500
Cc: markgw@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080628152540.GB22484@xxxxxx>
References: <20080627153928.GA31384@xxxxxx> <20080628000914.GE29319@disturbed> <486589E7.9010705@xxxxxxx> <4865BEAB.4030108@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080628152540.GB22484@xxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20080421)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:31:39PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> I guess I'm ambivalent too, is it really that invasive?  Maybe 10, 15
>> lines of code looks like?
> Currently it's implemented by adding m_inoadd surrounded by an
> #if XFS_BIG_INUMS.  This can be cleaned up by adding a helper ala
> xfs_ino_t xfs_user_ino(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_ino_t ino);
> but I don't really see the point as the option seems quite useless.  But
> if others thing the option is worth keeping around I'll do the helper
> instead.

Well, to be honest i've never even enabled it  :)

how much does xfsqa use it?

I guess I don't really care if it goes.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>