[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rfc: kill ino64 mount option

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: rfc: kill ino64 mount option
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:25:40 +0200
Cc: markgw@xxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4865BEAB.4030108@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080627153928.GA31384@xxxxxx> <20080628000914.GE29319@disturbed> <486589E7.9010705@xxxxxxx> <4865BEAB.4030108@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:31:39PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I guess I'm ambivalent too, is it really that invasive?  Maybe 10, 15
> lines of code looks like?

Currently it's implemented by adding m_inoadd surrounded by an
#if XFS_BIG_INUMS.  This can be cleaned up by adding a helper ala

xfs_ino_t xfs_user_ino(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_ino_t ino);

but I don't really see the point as the option seems quite useless.  But
if others thing the option is worth keeping around I'll do the helper
instead.I'll do the helper

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>