| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: rfc: kill ino64 mount option |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:09:14 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080627153928.GA31384@xxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20080627153928.GA31384@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:39:28PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Does anyone have objections to kill the ino64 mount option? It's purely > a debug tool to force inode numbers outside of the range representable > in 32bits and is quite invasive for something that could easily be > debugged by just having a large enough filesystem.. It's the "large enough fs" that is the problem. XFSQA uses small partitions for the most part, and this allows testing of 64 bit inode numbers with a standard qa config. That being said, I don't really if it goes or stays... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Xfs Access to block zero exception and system crash, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: rfc: kill ino64 mount option, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | rfc: kill ino64 mount option, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: rfc: kill ino64 mount option, Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |