| To: | Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements |
| From: | Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:26:39 -0700 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080627022407.GB7703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1214455277-6387-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1214455277-6387-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1214512405.21035.110.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080627022407.GB7703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 20:24 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Then leave them as semaphores. Really. > Are you saying you want to keep semaphores? Cause I think that goes against the overall agenda that I've seen, which is complete semaphore removal .. If you have issues with the removal method then we could change that .. Daniel |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/6] Replace inode flush semaphore with a completion, Matthew Wilcox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/6] Replace inode flush semaphore with a completion, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements, Matthew Wilcox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |