| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, matthew@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:07:00 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20080626112133.GJ11558@disturbed> |
| References: | <1214455277-6387-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1214455277-6387-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080626074636.GB7064@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080626112133.GJ11558@disturbed> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:21:33PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Ok, so that involves exactly what? A new header file, a new API name > (ideas anyone?) and kerneldoc comments? Yes, probably just a new header with properly documented functions. Thew two non-trivial ones you added should probably not be inlines, btw. flush_lock_init/flush_lock/flush_trylock/flush_done/flush_is_locked? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |