xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requireme

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, matthew@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:07:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <20080626112133.GJ11558@disturbed>
References: <1214455277-6387-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1214455277-6387-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080626074636.GB7064@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080626112133.GJ11558@disturbed>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:21:33PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Ok, so that involves exactly what? A new header file, a new API name
> (ideas anyone?) and kerneldoc comments?

Yes, probably just a new header with properly documented functions.
Thew two non-trivial ones you added should probably not be inlines,
btw.

flush_lock_init/flush_lock/flush_trylock/flush_done/flush_is_locked?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>