xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes

To: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes
From: Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=5qDWS4FlPKaSSojfylY4WZsPDm++/aNmTNjU7sMUgs6l+sjsxRXJCTfVZvlJIiwV4uNhasFGMX/S7+CzoDvqoCYkzP6gc9NpUEb4uOTdTLavFg6QNh3191Stl4JKYjivXkyX2gyn1PQAmVox8qMdfmQmAro0FkimMjh5bLcJZDQ=;
In-reply-to: <20080625180222.12885793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: MusicMan529@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
What type of RAID? If striping is involved, perhaps you should investigate the 
"su" and "sw" suboptions.

I also found some performance improvement with "-l lazy-count=1", although you 
may not wish to slow down repair times for a backup volume.
-- 
Mark

"What better place to find oneself than
 on the streets of one's home village?"
      --Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, "Family"


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>