| To: | Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes |
| From: | Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=5qDWS4FlPKaSSojfylY4WZsPDm++/aNmTNjU7sMUgs6l+sjsxRXJCTfVZvlJIiwV4uNhasFGMX/S7+CzoDvqoCYkzP6gc9NpUEb4uOTdTLavFg6QNh3191Stl4JKYjivXkyX2gyn1PQAmVox8qMdfmQmAro0FkimMjh5bLcJZDQ=; |
| In-reply-to: | <20080625180222.12885793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | MusicMan529@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
What type of RAID? If striping is involved, perhaps you should investigate the
"su" and "sw" suboptions.
I also found some performance improvement with "-l lazy-count=1", although you
may not wish to slow down repair times for a backup volume.
--
Mark
"What better place to find oneself than
on the streets of one's home village?"
--Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, "Family"
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes, Christoph Litauer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |