| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes) |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:23:22 -0500 |
| Cc: | Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <484F2CD7.9070506@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <484B15A3.4030505@xxxxxxxxxxx> <484CA425.3080606@xxxxxxxxxxx> <484DDDB3.70000@xxxxxxx> <484F0998.90306@xxxxxxxxxxx> <484F2CD7.9070506@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Timothy Shimmin wrote: > (1) It would be nice to know what the state of the apps really are. > There is also the question of interaction with CXFS and NFS. > Greg Banks has a compat matrix for NFS. It looks like the main > things is to get something half recent - linux 2.6, nfs v3, > apps which use 64 bit sys calls (eg. stat64) etc... > Would need to do investigating. Greg has a tool to scan binaries... some day I'm going to run it over the fedora universe, I'll get back to you... someday. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes), Richard Scobie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes), Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes), Richard Scobie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes), Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |