| To: | "Andi Kleen" <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS directory entries sort order |
| From: | "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:04:56 +1000 |
| Cc: | dizzy <dizzy@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <484F1541.7010203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI |
| References: | <200806101245.09950.dizzy@xxxxxxxxx> <87prqpp5q7.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.ucj4nqkv3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <484F1541.7010203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Opera Mail/9.24 (Win32) |
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:58:57 +1000, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: readdir order is not dependant on the hashes. The order depends on the order of files being created, unlinked and the length of the filenames being unlinked/created.Thanks for the correction. It's a long time that I read that source so it probably got confused with some other fs. If I read the code correctly, in node-form directories, it will try and use the same data block that other names with the same hash are located in. Barry. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS., Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Returned mail: User unknown (from [211.1.194.36]), Mail Delivery Subsystem |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS directory entries sort order, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS] oss.sgi, Oliver Pinter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |