| To: | Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS directory entries sort order |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:58:57 +0200 |
| Cc: | dizzy <dizzy@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <op.ucj4nqkv3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200806101245.09950.dizzy@xxxxxxxxx> <87prqpp5q7.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.ucj4nqkv3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911) |
> readdir order is not dependant on the hashes. The order depends on the > order of files being created, unlinked and the length of the filenames > being unlinked/created. Thanks for the correction. It's a long time that I read that source so it probably got confused with some other fs. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS directory entries sort order, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS., Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS directory entries sort order, Barry Naujok |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS directory entries sort order, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |