xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS.

To: Lance Reed <lreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS.
From: "'hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:01:46 -0400
Cc: "'hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D3FC9317@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D3FC9317@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:50:30AM -0400, Lance Reed wrote:
> Thanks!
> 
> Yes the log died and was zeroed already with xfs_repair already.
> 
> So I plan to put a 64bit head on the volumes and leave it that way.
> 
> I asuume I need to still keep it under 16 tb since the fs datastuctures are 
> 32bit?
> 

All XFS data structures (which matter for this) are 64bit.  But the
pagecache size in 32bit x86 systems is indeeed limited, so a larger
filesystem won't work there.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>