xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS.

To: Lance Reed <lreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS.
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:28:11 -0400
Cc: Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D3F6C8B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D3F6C8A8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080610115038.GD3005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D3F6C8B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:07:18AM -0400, Lance Reed wrote:
> SO, I take it from what you say that that I can running any newer version of 
> xfs progs and a 64bit host (fiber attached, easy to do this), and run 
> xfs_repair on the 32bit XFS volumes without fear of data corruption?
> Is this because XFS is not version specific, and xfs_repair will honor the 
> 32bit file data structures?

Yes, this is fine.  All the actual filesystem structures are endian and
32/64bit clean.  The log needs to be in the same endianess and had 32bit
vs 64bit problems on x86 for a while, but it needs to be recovered
before you run xfs_repair anyway.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>