xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] fix dir2 shortform structures on ARM old ABI

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dir2 shortform structures on ARM old ABI
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:52:12 -0500
Cc: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080605054938.GA17690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <47DB4181.7040603@xxxxxxxxxxx> <480E89B5.8070006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <481B7FD1.3030107@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080505070847.GH155679365@xxxxxxx> <481FDCD1.2010905@xxxxxxx> <4820609C.9090306@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48477BD6.2020909@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080605054938.GA17690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:38:30AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
>> Guys, this is SIMPLE, SAFE, and it fixes a CORRUPTION BUG.
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>> As it only defines __arch_pack for __arm__,
> 
> __arch_pack is a horrible name and not very intuitive, what's wrong
> with __on_disk or something else?
> 

because __on_disk implies that it's on disk.

__arch_pack means that it's packed on some arches.

Not the same thing.

If anyone wants to change the name to __purple_ponies or whatever that's
fine, but the intent is to pack these 3(?) and only these 3 structs on
this arch and only this arch, at least for now.

'til Jeff gets his all-singing all-dancing no-regression gcc annotation
in place anyway.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>