xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Questions for article

To: Thomas King <kingttx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Questions for article
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:52:14 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19868.143.166.226.57.1212507288.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <19868.143.166.226.57.1212507288.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Le Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:34:48 -0500 (CDT)
Thomas King <kingttx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:

> I am writing an article to answer Henry Newman's at
> http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/sans/features/article.php/3749926.
> I've already been bugging folks on the ext4 mailing list and one of
> them mentioned I should also send some of the same questions to this
> list. Please let me know if I may do so.

Seems like a good idea. This guy doesn't even mention XFS, while it's
more or less the only viable option for big filesystems (more than 8TB).
I currently use 30, 40TB XFS filesystems that work just fine.

I've already compared all filesystems : XFS works great for big
filesystems. JFS works well too, however it lacks a defragmenting
utility which is quite a problem for big filesystems with lots of write
activity. reiserfs 3.6 simply breaks over 4TB; mkfs.ext3 is so slow
than it's a problem from the start, then the performance is abysmal.


-- 
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Intellique
----------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>