| To: | Gary Lowell <glowell@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: DMAPI JFS bug fixes |
| From: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:57:13 +1000 |
| Cc: | markgw@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4FC34C16-F0FA-49C5-88CC-83EEF616C218@xxxxxxxxx> (Gary Lowell's message of "Thu, 29 May 2008 19:16:01 -0700") |
| References: | <483C78E2.4090000@xxxxxxxxx> <483C8227.6090408@xxxxxxx> <4FC34C16-F0FA-49C5-88CC-83EEF616C218@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.0.60 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) |
Gary Lowell <glowell@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On May 27, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Mark Goodwin wrote: >> Gary Lowell wrote: >>> Hi - >>> The JFS version of DMAPI had a handful of bug fixes that don't seem >>> to be in the current tree. I couldn't find anything in the list >>> archive about them. Would there be any interest in applying those >>> fixes or is DMAPI pretty much dead ? >> >> no it's not dead :) >> >>> If there is interest, I've got a patch. >> >> yes please post it here, with due reference to the original author(s). >> >> Thanks > > Great. I'll double check that they still work with TOT and post them. And i thought JFS was dead =) any patch would do, I've been looking around and couldn't really find a repository of the JFS/DMAPI changes. did you find anything like that ? Cheers, -- Niv Sardi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] scale down 074 on lower end machines, Niv Sardi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 907752 -, Niv Sardi-Altivanik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: REVIEW: xfs_reno #2, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: DMAPI JFS bug fixes, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |