| To: | Spam Magnet <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:59:43 +0200 |
| Cc: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3607657a0806031056w24efa917q625f13bfe9eaa706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3607657a0805291005k457791cej1c5f867da0f95965@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3607657a0805291446t79808c63l664780c1cbc3d871@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <483F907A.3020108@xxxxxxx> <3607657a0805301019h4a49dc86ne8f1f019629a1c41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4840406F.50402@xxxxxxxxxx> <48408D3E.3090401@xxxxxxxxx> <48409981.1050405@xxxxxxxxxx> <48425148.1080105@xxxxxxxxx> <48427DEE.40400@xxxxxxxxxx> <3607657a0806031036r702ab6a5w7ca6517c19395b9b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3607657a0806031056w24efa917q625f13bfe9eaa706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Spam Magnet wrote: (The healthy disk image also doesn't have any XFS but it has: 'S f x' (capital s))Correcting my mistake: The healthy image file does have the X F S B at 10000000 (octal) as fdisk had reported: Pt# Device Info Start End Sectors Id System 8: 2gb-ubuntu.img1 4096 3915599 3911504 a SGI xfs 4096*512=2097152 (10000000 octal): $ od -t c 2gb-ubuntu.img | grep 10000000 10000000 X F S B \0 \0 020 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \a u 350 I tried to see if I can find do the same thing for jaz7.img: Pt# Device Info Start End Sectors Id System 8: jaz7.img1 3072 2091007 2087936 a SGI xfs $ od -t c jaz7.img | grep 6000000 6000000 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 I guess all those zeros are not good signs. Wait a moment. Aren't jaz sectors 2k each? Try at 3072*2048 instead. // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Limits of the 965 chipset & 3 PCI-e cards/southbridge? ~774MiB/s peak for read, ~650MiB/s peak for write?, Bryan Mesich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |