| To: | "Stefan Smietanowski" <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed |
| From: | "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:36:26 -0400 |
| Cc: | "Timothy Shimmin" <tes@xxxxxxx>, "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VFmrDnzXs0qDxYTyPcIOhYjHhJmwsIxURReKYTq+stY=; b=YBiNzwA3uwaLBnyj03w57My+jz+SwX2zOlnq5TLQoUzazjErs0phDWk6wl16Q8Fi11jYa8sHMNGDIUcFqmZ0VcfQKxT/HgLS/aKwM8VA9912WG/8Xi2QuAVMn+nzFWMggjvO2Gd1UVfMEx7FCC5Ko/Vi1KFV2IGG0H0E4Q9ZmP8= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hj69/78IcJtFuzjQSAl9w+/sWDhg8C3OzIsTtyxamn1glWyK6vzuVCloYT/H/NboESp9b6yMwaA1BfxxOeKWSDHV2wV5HmmGenb3X93dR30OLdOcLy00NAObbgkVx6B7dwDVoU/gbQmQroNdwyPrYmQvbQrgPCrp8z0NZHE42Ts= |
| In-reply-to: | <48427DEE.40400@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3607657a0805291005k457791cej1c5f867da0f95965@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <483F1AED.3010808@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3607657a0805291446t79808c63l664780c1cbc3d871@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <483F907A.3020108@xxxxxxx> <3607657a0805301019h4a49dc86ne8f1f019629a1c41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4840406F.50402@xxxxxxxxxx> <48408D3E.3090401@xxxxxxxxx> <48409981.1050405@xxxxxxxxxx> <48425148.1080105@xxxxxxxxx> <48427DEE.40400@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One way is : od -t c jaz7.img | grep X | head > > Look for X F S B, may be split on two lines for you. > > This is what my disk looks like but of course, it's on a DOS > partition: > > 0077000 X F S B \0 \0 020 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 ` \0 > I couldn't find any XFS by using the full dump of the disk: $ od -t c jaz7.img | grep X | head 0040000 353 > 220 ( j 0 X ] I H C \0 002 001 \0 0040240 003 303 H 367 363 001 F 374 021 N 376 Z X 273 \0 \a 0040560 023 Y Z X r \t @ u 001 B 003 ^ \v 342 314 303 1041040 5 0 E X E ! \0 K - H 1141360 031 \0 t \b P \r 362 \t . \0 265 P X \f 026 z 1141400 # 001 353 \n X 034 022 020 D 001 I 016 X 034 @ 023 (The healthy disk image also doesn't have any XFS but it has: 'S f x' (capital s)) 50.exe at offset 1041040 made me check the image file using a Windows utility called : UFS Explorer. (www.ufsexplorer.com) They claim that they can recover XFS partitions. To my surprise that software recognized the image as a FAT16 file system containing only one single file called "50.exe" I am more inclined to believe 'fdisk' rather than UFS Explorer: Most likely the original format that Iomega had shipped the Jaz disk with was a FAT16 and then somebody in our lab had decided to format it to xfs. I am beginning to feel that I will need to recover my data manually, one file at a time :( (It's really frustrating that I can see all my beautiful file names through hexdump but can't access them). So is there a preferred way of hard disk/partition recovery for XFS file system ? And if I end up doing that, where can I get more info about the underwork of xfs ? thank you all for your patience and help. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Questions for article, Thomas King |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Spam Magnet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |