| To: | Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: Zero uninitialised xfs_da_args structure in xfs_dir2.c |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Jun 2008 01:50:28 -0400 |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <op.ub3wttk53jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <op.ub3wttk53jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:42:55PM +1000, Barry Naujok wrote: > In particular, this patch fixes a problem in the xfs_dir2_remove and > xfs_dir2_replace paths which internally can call a lookup function > which will use args->cmpresult which is uninitialised. > Index: 2.6.x-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c > =================================================================== > --- 2.6.x-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c > +++ 2.6.x-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c > @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ xfs_dir_createname( > if ((rval = xfs_dir_ino_validate(tp->t_mountp, inum))) > return rval; > XFS_STATS_INC(xs_dir_create); > + memset(&args, 0, sizeof(xfs_da_args_t)); > > args.name = name->name; > args.namelen = name->len; Doing these memsets looks good. Stylisticly I'd rather put them directly in front of the intialization for the actually used args fields. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | REVIEW: Zero uninitialised xfs_da_args structure in xfs_dir2.c, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: REVIEW: Zero uninitialised xfs_da_args structure in xfs_dir2.c, Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | REVIEW: Zero uninitialised xfs_da_args structure in xfs_dir2.c, Barry Naujok |
| Next by Thread: | Re: REVIEW: Zero uninitialised xfs_da_args structure in xfs_dir2.c, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |