| To: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: DMAPI JFS bug fixes |
| From: | Gary Lowell <glowell@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 May 2008 19:16:01 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <483C8227.6090408@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <483C78E2.4090000@xxxxxxxxx> <483C8227.6090408@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On May 27, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Mark Goodwin wrote: Gary Lowell wrote:Hi -The JFS version of DMAPI had a handful of bug fixes that don't seem to be in the current tree. I couldn't find anything in the list archive about them. Would there be any interest in applying those fixes or is DMAPI pretty much dead ?no it's not dead :)If there is interest, I've got a patch.yes please post it here, with due reference to the original author(s). Thanks Great. I'll double check that they still work with TOT and post them. Cheers, Gary |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 982545 - Only use xfs_buf_t locks when doing prefetched repair, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: SB validate failed, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: DMAPI JFS bug fixes, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++), Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |