| To: | Jens Bäckman <jens.backman@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) |
| From: | Bryan Mesich <bryan.mesich@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 May 2008 11:46:16 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <95711f160805280934y77ed7d91tec5aeb531bf8013c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Bryan Mesich <bryan.mesich@xxxxxxxx>, Jens Bäckman <jens.backman@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.1.10.0805280442330.4527@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <95711f160805280934y77ed7d91tec5aeb531bf8013c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Bryan Mesich <bryan.mesich@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 06:34:00PM +0200, Jens Bäckman wrote: > Either the RAID 1 read speed must be wrong, or something is odd in the > Linux implementation. There's six drives that can be used for reading > at the same time, as they contain the very same data. 63MB/s > sequential looks like what you would get from a single drive. The RAID 1 read speed metrics do not depict multithreaded processes reading from the array simutaneouly. I would suspect that the read performance metrics would look better if 2 bonnie simulations were ran together (for RAID 1 that is). Bryan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++), Chris Snook |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++), Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++), Chris Snook |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++), Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |