[Top] [All Lists]


To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: xfs_check
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:26:05 +0200
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
In the past we had quite a few cases where we told people to run
xfs_repair -n instead of xfs_check.  I think that makes a lot of sense
because xfs_repair -n generally gives output at least as useful as
xfs_check if not more so and also is a lot faster.  Is there any reason
why we shouldn't simply kill xfs_check and replaced it with a wrapper
around xfs_repair?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>