xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] xfsqa test to check log size scaling

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] xfsqa test to check log size scaling
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 08:12:52 +1000
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080522132542.GC4972@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080522061257.GR173056135@xxxxxxx> <20080522132542.GC4972@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:25:42AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:12:57PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > XFS-QA test to check that log size scaling works correctly
> > for old and new maximum log sizes.
> 
> Am I missing somethign or would this fail if the partitions used for
> xfsqa are smaller than 256GB?  I don't even have that much total storage
> on my laptop :)

Uses loop devices and sparse files - should work just fine on any partition a
bit over 2GB (the log gets zeroed during mkfs). I know it passses on a 14GB
scratch filesystem....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>