| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] xfsqa test to check log size scaling |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 May 2008 08:12:52 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080522132542.GC4972@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080522061257.GR173056135@xxxxxxx> <20080522132542.GC4972@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:25:42AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:12:57PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > > XFS-QA test to check that log size scaling works correctly > > for old and new maximum log sizes. > > Am I missing somethign or would this fail if the partitions used for > xfsqa are smaller than 256GB? I don't even have that much total storage > on my laptop :) Uses loop devices and sparse files - should work just fine on any partition a bit over 2GB (the log gets zeroed during mkfs). I know it passses on a 14GB scratch filesystem.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] always set a/c/mtime through ->setattr, Miklos Szeredi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] make inode reclaim wait for log I/O to complete, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] xfsqa test to check log size scaling, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] xfsqa test to check log size scaling, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |