| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 May 2008 06:19:18 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080519221057.75e0a775@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080516222755.3e557c00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080518131855.GA1383@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080518132127.GA19006@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080518154208.77b6be3e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080519221057.75e0a775@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:10:57PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Sun, 18 May 2008 15:42:08 +0200 vous ?criviez: > > > IIRC I tried both, however I'll double check monday... > > Well obviously I didn't try both, because it worked as expected when > using "inode64". I've submitted a patch that should give back an error when remounting with an option not supported in remount, that should fix this little oversight in the future. Thanks for the report! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: take messages, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |