| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 18 May 2008 09:21:27 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080518131855.GA1383@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080516222755.3e557c00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080518131855.GA1383@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:18:55AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The only significant thing I see is that the FS is really close to 16 > > TB of allocated data (15.7TB). I tried mounting it with "inode64" > > option with no more loving. > > Did you remount it with that option as in mount -o remount or did you > completely unmount it and mount it again? Unfortunately none of the > xfs-specific mount options can be reset with remount yet, and it doesn't > return an error either (both are added to my todo list now) Oh, and please post the output of /proc/self/mounts to see if all expected mount options are actualy seen by the filesystem. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't, Emmanuel Florac |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |