xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:21:27 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080518131855.GA1383@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080516222755.3e557c00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080518131855.GA1383@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:18:55AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The only significant thing I see is that the FS is really close to 16
> > TB of allocated data (15.7TB). I tried mounting it with "inode64"
> > option with no more loving.
> 
> Did you remount it with that option as in mount -o remount or did you
> completely unmount it and mount it again?  Unfortunately none of the
> xfs-specific mount options can be reset with remount yet, and it doesn't
> return an error either (both are added to my todo list now)

Oh, and please post the output of /proc/self/mounts to see if all
expected mount options are actualy seen by the filesystem.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>