xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] scale down 074 on lower end machines

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scale down 074 on lower end machines
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:26:51 +1000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080515221510.GT155679365@xxxxxxx>
References: <20080515173913.GA11494@xxxxxx> <20080515221510.GT155679365@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:15:10AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 07:39:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 074 takes ages to complete on my kvm test VM, but scaling it back to the
> > level used on IRIX makes it complete in slightly under 10 minutes.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if checking for UP vs SMP is the right way to go into slow
> > mode, but I couldn't think of anything better.
> 
> Seems fair - I was wondering exactly the same thing yesterday
> as this is another test that takes >15min to run on UML. I didn't
> think of the UP vs SMP trigger, but it seems like a good way to
> go given all of the real QA boxes we have are SMP.
> 
> I'll give it a run and see how it goes.

FWIW - runtime on UML has dropped from 918s to 88s. Very reasonable
now, and makes the maximum single test runtime in UML about 330s....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>