Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 05:36:05PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > Dave already commited the original version, but I'll send an update
> > to use set_prog_path later today.
> 
> Sorry, didn't see that Tim replied as well. set_prog_path is fine
> by me too, but stopping every test from running because killall is
> not present is a bit of overkill, isn't it?

My plan was to use it in 167 not common.config.  But I don't really care
either way.